Data Sitea

Grayscale survey connects COVID-19 pandemic to new Bitcoin purchases

2020.11.18 00:01 FuzzyOneAdmin Grayscale survey connects COVID-19 pandemic to new Bitcoin purchases

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteAs Bitcoin price rises toward $18,000 and traders attempt to secure a new all-time high, the surge of institutional investors jumping on the Bitcoin (BTC) bandwagon continues. This time, institutional and retail investors are both keen to accumulate Bitcoin, and data from crypto derivatives markets shows institutional investors are […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.11.15 11:53 FuzzyOneAdmin A Bitcoin whale just shorted $100M BTC — Are big holders expecting a larger drop?

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteA Bitcoin (BTC) whale placed a $100 million short on Bybit, according to the pseudonyms trader CL. It comes after various on-chain data points toward a whale-driven sell-off throughout the past week. Though the momentum of Bitcoin remains strong, there are many reasons that make $16,000 an attractive […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.11.06 20:01 FuzzyOneAdmin How decisive are traders with Bitcoin above $15,000?

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteAs Bitcoin hit 2020’s ATH at nearly $15800, open interest on top derivatives exchanges like CME and Bakkt went up. On CME, where top institutions trade, the open interest increased by 16% to $933 Million. CME futures open interest and volume Source: Skew Based on data from […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.11.06 09:56 FuzzyOneAdmin Bitcoin miner revenue surges to pre-halving levels

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteAs the Bitcoin (BTC) price is reaching the highest levels since January 2018, Bitcoin mining is getting more profitable due to a number of factors. According to data from Blockchain.com, BTC miners revenue has soared to levels not seen since Bitcoin’s third halving in May 2020 that reduced […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.10.21 23:02 FuzzyOneAdmin 10% of Bitcoin's supply has been untouched for over 10 years: Report

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteA significant amount of Bitcoin’s (BTC) total supply has not moved for more than 10 years, according to data from cryptocurrency analytics data provider Glassnode. During this decade-long interim, 1.8 million Bitcoin (of the current 18.5 million supply) has been locked in dormant Bitcoin addresses. Its cumulative value amounts […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.10.15 19:01 FuzzyOneAdmin Foresight or folly? Data show 70% of exchanges are unmoved by DeFi volume

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteA recent survey by cryptocurrency data aggregator, CryptoCompare, shows that centralized exchange operators do not see the emergence of decentralized trading venues like Uniswap as a threat despite growing volume and activity in the DeFi space.  In its September exchange review, CryptoCompare asked 26 of the leading venues […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.10.12 13:01 FuzzyOneAdmin 'Boring is good' as global air cargo market takes another step to recovery in September

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteA record ‘dynamic loadfactor’ and high airfreight rates on the world’s premier trade lanes in September showed the global air cargo market edging towards a sustainable recovery at the start of the traditional peak season, says industry analysts CLIVE Data Services and TAC Index. Chargeable weight in September […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.09.27 11:01 FuzzyOneAdmin Ultimate Bitcoin bull case: trader says 23 factors show a rally is due

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteA pseudonymous Bitcoin (BTC) trader outlined 23 key technical and fundamental factors that could buoy BTC’s medium-term bull case. The data points shared by the trader, known as “Byzantine General,” fit into four major themes. They are a less overheated market, a neutralizing futures market, less leveraged traders […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.09.19 16:54 FuzzyOneAdmin New Bitcoin bull run? Whales and institutions accumulating, data shows

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteAs the price of Bitcoin (BTC) breaks past $11,100 on Sep. 19, whale activities and Bakkt’s all-time high volume suggests strengthening momentum. The 4-hour price chart of Bitcoin. Source: TradingView.com According to CryptoQuant’s Ki Young Ju, fewer whales have been sending BTC to exchanges. Historically, the data indicates […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.09.13 18:54 FuzzyOneAdmin COVID-19 shook out retail investors but emboldened BTC whales: Report

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteAs the COVID-19 pandemic began, retail and institutional Bitcoin investors took very different approaches, new research from OKEx Insights and Catallact showed.  The research, which looked at on-chain BTC transaction data from January to the beginning of August 2020, found retail investors largely pulled back and took a […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.09.03 06:53 FuzzyOneAdmin Yield farming frenzy pushes Uniswap daily volume over $1 billion

This post was originally published on this siteThis post was originally published on this siteA dramatic spike in yield farming activity associated with SushiSwap and similar protocols has seen Uniswap become the first decentralized exchange (DEX) to exceed $1 billion in 24-hour trade volume. According to crypto data aggregator CoinGecko, Uniswap V2 is currently the third-largest exchange by normalized trade volume with […]
submitted by FuzzyOneAdmin to fuzzyone [link] [comments]


2020.06.06 03:13 diego7319 How to use traefik letsencrypt for multiple containers with different domains

So, I have to create several webpages using docker compose, I had to create a new siteB in a server with an existing siteA. Theres a docker compose file for traefik for using his tls certification and nginx as a web server. Traerik routers everything to 80 and nginx uses that port. So when I used the already configured siteA subdomain to the new siteB for testing it worked fine.
Original label
traefik.http.routers.wcoSecure.rule=(Host(`siteA.com`)Host(`www.siteA.com`)Host(`www.subdomain.siteA.com`)Host(`subdomain.siteA.com`)) and nginx server { server_name siteA.com; listen 80; location / { proxy_pass http://flask:5000; proxy_set_header Host $http_host; } } -->added for testing siteB server { server_name subdomain.siteA.com; listen 80; location / { proxy_pass http://flask:5000; proxy_set_header Host $http_host; } } 
So when i got the new domain just changed those lines (subdomain for the real siteB domain) and started to get on siteB (new domain) the error too many redirects . I had to change from flexible encryption mode in cloudflare to full encryption to get it working(now showing a cloudflare certification instead of letsencrypt), my doubt is about , do I need to create a new certification with acme for the new domain? or theres a missconfiguration in my files.
#nginx conf user nginx; worker_processes 1; error_log /valog/nginx/error.log warn; pid /varun/nginx.pid; events { worker_connections 1024; } http { include /etc/nginx/mime.types; default_type application/octet-stream; log_format main '$remote_addr - $remote_user [$time_local] "$request" ' '$status $body_bytes_sent "$http_referer" ' '"$http_user_agent" "$http_x_forwarded_for"'; access_log /valog/nginx/access.log main; sendfile on; #tcp_nopush on; keepalive_timeout 65; #gzip on; #include /etc/nginx/conf.d/*.conf; server { server_name originalsiteA.com; listen 80; location / { proxy_pass http://flask:5000; proxy_set_header Host $http_host; } } server { server_name newsiteB; listen 80; location / { proxy_pass http://flask2:5002; proxy_set_header Host $http_host; } } } 
traefik config
#traefik.toml [certificatesResolvers] [certificatesResolvers.wco] [certificatesResolvers.wco.acme] email = "email_originalprogrammer" storage = "/acme.json" [certificatesResolvers.wco.acme.httpChallenge] entryPoint = "http" [api] dashboard = true insecure = true [entryPoints] # Defaults [entryPoints.http] address = ":80" [entryPoints.https] address = ":443" [global] sendAnonymousUsage = false [providers] [providers.file] filename = "dynamic.toml" [providers.docker] endpoint = "unix:///varun/docker.sock" exposedByDefault = false [log] filePath = "/tmp/traefik.log" level = "INFO" 
acme file
{ "wco": { "Account": { "Email": "same email as before", "Registration": { "body": { "status": "valid", "contact": [ "mailto:sameemail as before" ] }, "uri": "some link to acme site " }, "PrivateKey": "well the private type", "KeyType": "4096" }, "Certificates": null } } 
traefik compose
version: "3.7" services: router: image: traefik:v2.2 labels: - "traefik.enable=true" - "traefik.http.routers.api.entryPoints=traefik" - "[email protected]" networks: - wcotraefik ports: - "80:80" - "443:443" - "12738:12738" restart: unless-stopped volumes: # Monitor docker - /varun/docker.sock:/varun/docker.sock # Acme certs - ${PWD}/acme.json:/acme.json # Dynamic config - ${PWD}/dynamic.toml:/dynamic.toml # Static config - ${PWD}/traefik.toml:/traefik.toml networks: wcotraefik: external: true 
and the web apps in flask
# Production environment version: "3.7" services: # Python image for Flask flask: build: context: flask depends_on: - mongo environment: - MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME=${MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME-wcoSecret} - MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD=${MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD-wcoSecret} # The regular (non-admin) user - MONGO_USER=${MONGO_USER-wcoSecret} - MONGO_PASS=${MONGO_PASS-wcoSecret} # Key to pass to flask to allow certain tasks (e.g. re-run scraper) - WCO_MANAGEMENT_KEY=qwrty expose: - "5000" networks: - wcotraefik restart: "unless-stopped" #Python server 2 flask2: build: context: flask2 depends_on: - mongo environment: - MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME=${MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME-wcoSecret} - MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD=${MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD-wcoSecret} # The regular (non-admin) user - MONGO_USER=${MONGO_USER-wcoSecret} - MONGO_PASS=${MONGO_PASS-wcoSecret} # Key to pass to flask to allow certain tasks (e.g. re-run scraper) - WCO_MANAGEMENT_KEY=qwrty expose: - 5002 networks: - wcotraefik restart: "unless-stopped" mongo: environment: - MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME=${MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_USERNAME-wcoSecret} - MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD=${MONGO_INITDB_ROOT_PASSWORD-wcoSecret} - MONGO_USER=${MONGO_USER-wcoSecret} - MONGO_PASS=${MONGO_PASS-wcoSecret} image: mongo:4.2-bionic networks: - wcotraefik restart: "unless-stopped" volumes: - "./mongo:/data/db" nginx: depends_on: - flask - flask2 - mongo expose: - "80" image: nginx:latest labels: - "traefik.enable=true" - "traefik.docker.network=wcotraefik" - "traefik.http.routers.wcoInsecure.entryPoints=http" - "traefik.http.routers.wcoInsecure.rule="(Host(`siteA.com`)Host(`www.siteA.com`)Host(`siteB.com`))" - "traefik.http.middlewares.wcoInsecure.redirectscheme.scheme=https" - "traefik.http.routers.wcoInsecure.middlewares=wcoInsecure" - "traefik.http.routers.wcoSecure.entryPoints=https" - "traefik.http.routers.wcoSecure.rule=(Host(`siteA.com`)Host(`www.siteA.com`)Host(`siteB.com`))" - "traefik.http.routers.wcoSecure.tls" #- "traefik.http.routers.wcoSecure.tls.certResolver=wco" networks: - wcotraefik #ports: #- 80:80 volumes: - "${HOME}/wco/nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf:ro" networks: wcotraefik: external: true 
My guess is that somehow the encryption is only working for the siteA domain. All of the tutorials i seen was related to subdomain support, but I want to host multiple webpages with differente domains. Any idea would be appreciated. Thanks
submitted by diego7319 to Traefik [link] [comments]


2020.05.15 14:39 adamgater ISP MPLS design

Hi all,
I'm looking at doing a re-design of an ISP network I recently inherited. The diagram explains it reasonably well (I hope). It's an MPLS network with a BGP free core - we have OSPF running as an IGP. We don't have an traffic engineering on the network at this stage.
Their are actually two more sites, but I've excluded them as it makes the diagram too complicated.
The network is fully meshed - although I haven't drawn all the iBGP session in (too many lines), with RR used for the two other sites.
The most recent addition is are the edge routers (ASR9K's) at both siteA and siteB. The heavy black line indicates a physical link with MPLS enabled, the green lines indicate OSPF&MPLS enabled links and the red lines indicate just IP traffic (no mpls or ospf, but iBGP is enabled).
My first question is, should the edge routers not have MPLS enabled and just feed the PE devices IP data? Not having MPLS enabled would mean an MPLS label would not need to be assigned to every eBGP learned prefix (from transit and peering)
If this is the case, how would you feed data from an edge router in SiteA to a PE router in SiteB - I thought perhaps the use of a router-reflector would be a likely option. As the diagram indicates, we currently have an iBGP session with MPLS enabled on the edge.
If MPLS on the edge routers is a good design option, are the number of labels allocated to each learned prefix a concern? I know the ASR9k's are well spec'd devices but, just because they can handle it, doesn't always mean it's a good idea :)
If their is a better design, by all means please suggest one.
Any advice would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Adam


https://preview.redd.it/8uqi2cbtbxy41.png?width=643&format=png&auto=webp&s=25929abeac03486dff8f35c4cfa9a9963e9a5187
submitted by adamgater to Cisco [link] [comments]


2020.02.06 05:16 anothernetgeek Replicate servers question.

Hey Guys, I'm stuck on the best solution to this problem...
I have a customer with two sites, each in a different state. They have a central application they run, with one instance for each site. However some users in SiteA need to access data in ApplicationB, and some users in SiteB need to access data in ApplicationA.
Until recently we had a server in Site A, running a Terminal server app in a window, for all the users in SiteB. Both ApplictionA and ApplicationB were running on the server in SiteA.
Well, we had an outage, and it was very frustrating for the users in SiteB that they could not run ApplicationB just because the other site was having an outage. Without this application, work stops...
So, we're looking to put two smallish servers in each site. Each site will have a Domain Controller, a File Server, and a Terminal server. There is a site to site VPN between the two sites also.
I was wondering if Veeam would allow us to run a two-way back between the two servers?
Also, is there a way to replicate the servers. It would be nice to have a sandboxed copy of ApplicationA running in SiteB, that I could fail over to, to allow users in SiteA to keep running when SiteA server goes down.
submitted by anothernetgeek to Veeam [link] [comments]


2019.11.04 00:52 Vin-Cheezel OOBM design brain fart. cant route.

Hello network gods.
building up a new greenfield and spending some time making a robust OOBM between two sites.
need guidance as to what i'm doing wrong..

Two sites, Two OOBM switches in each site. L2 and L3 within each site. L3 OSPF between sites.
Attached is a diagram of the design and current config.

Im having issues being able to route from one site to the other. Site 1 being 10.x.18.0/24 Site 2 being 10.x.19.0/24
Anyone able to point me in the right direction?
Diagram: https://imgur.com/a/9BP7lTO
UPDATE
Fault found in management vrf ip route misconfigured! deffs a brain fart.
IPN101 Config
!Command: show running-config version 7.0(3)I7(6) Bios:version 05.34 switchname IPN101 feature telnet feature nxapi feature ospf feature pim feature interface-vlan feature hsrp feature dhcp feature lldp vlan 1,4,1337 vlan 4 name IPN vlan 1337 name OOBM service dhcp ip dhcp relay no ipv6 dhcp relay vrf context OOBM interface Vlan1337 description VL for OOBM on IPN no shutdown vrf member OOBM ip address 10.x.18.2/24 ip ospf network point-to-point ip router ospf a2 area 1.1.1.1 hsrp version 2 hsrp 2 ip 10.x.18.1 interface Ethernet1/1-48 switchport access vlan 1337 interface Ethernet1/51.1 description OOBM interlink to IPN201 mtu 9150 encapsulation dot1q 1337 vrf member OOBM ip address 10.x.254.126/31 ip ospf network point-to-point ip router ospf a2 area 1.1.1.1 no shutdown interface Ethernet1/52.1 description OOBM interlink to IPN102 mtu 9150 encapsulation dot1q 1337 vrf member OOBM ip address 10.x.254.124/31 ip ospf network point-to-point ip router ospf a2 area 1.1.1.1 no shutdown interface mgmt0 vrf member management ip address 10.x.18.6/24 

show ip route vrf OOBM
IP Route Table for VRF "OOBM" '*' denotes best ucast next-hop '**' denotes best mcast next-hop '[x/y]' denotes [preference/metric] '%' in via output denotes VRF  10.x.18.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.18.2, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d00h, direct 10.x.18.1/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.18.1, Vlan1337, [0/0], 3d22h, hsrp 10.x.18.2/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.18.2, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d00h, local 10.x.19.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.127, Eth1/51.1, [110/44], 00:58:27, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.112/30, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.114, Eth1/47, [0/0], 3d21h, direct 10.x.254.114/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.114, Eth1/47, [0/0], 3d21h, local 10.x.254.116/30, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.125, Eth1/52.1, [110/44], 3d21h, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.120/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.127, Eth1/51.1, [110/8], 00:58:27, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.122/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.125, Eth1/52.1, [110/8], 00:58:36, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.124/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.124, Eth1/52.1, [0/0], 2w3d, direct 10.x.254.124/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.124, Eth1/52.1, [0/0], 2w3d, local 10.x.254.126/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.126, Eth1/51.1, [0/0], 00:58:40, direct 10.x.254.126/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.126, Eth1/51.1, [0/0], 00:58:40, local 
IPN101 ping to Site B 10.x.19.1 HSRP address
PING 10.x.19.1 (10.x.19.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=1.871 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=1.036 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=1.08 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=253 time=1.463 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=253 time=1.368 ms 
IPN101 traceroute to 10.x.19.1 HSRP address
traceroute to 10.x.19.1 (10.x.19.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 10.x.19.1 (10.x.19.1) 1.827 ms 1.263 ms 1.247 ms 
Shouldnt this traceroute be 2 hops ?
IPN 201 show ip route vrf OOBM
IP Route Table for VRF "OOBM" '*' denotes best ucast next-hop '**' denotes best mcast next-hop '[x/y]' denotes [preference/metric] '%' in via output denotes VRF  10.x.18.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.126, Eth1/51.1, [110/44], 02:12:22, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.19.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.19.2, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d01h, direct 10.x.19.1/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.19.1, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d01h, hsrp 10.x.19.2/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.19.2, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d01h, local 10.x.254.112/30, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.126, Eth1/51.1, [110/44], 02:12:22, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.116/30, ubest/mbest: 2/0 *via 10.x.254.121, Eth1/52.1, [110/48], 02:12:22, ospf-a2, intra *via 10.x.254.126, Eth1/51.1, [110/48], 02:12:22, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.120/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.120, Eth1/52.1, [0/0], 4d02h, direct 10.x.254.120/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.120, Eth1/52.1, [0/0], 4d02h, local 10.x.254.122/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.121, Eth1/52.1, [110/8], 02:12:31, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.124/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.126, Eth1/51.1, [110/8], 02:12:22, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.126/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.127, Eth1/51.1, [0/0], 02:12:35, direct 10.x.254.127/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.127, Eth1/51.1, [0/0], 02:12:35, local 
IPN201 ping to Site A 10.x.18.1 HSRP address
IPN201# ping 10.x.18.1 vrf OOBM PING 10.x.18.1 (10.x.18.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=253 time=1.831 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=253 time=1.304 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=253 time=1.13 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=253 time=1.116 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=253 time=1.053 ms 
IPN201 traceroute to 10.x.18.1 HSRP address
traceroute to 10.x.18.1 (10.x.18.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 10.x.18.1 (10.x.18.1) 1.85 ms 1.288 ms 1.405 ms 
Shouldnt this traceroute be 2 hops ?
IPN102 show ip route vrf OOBM
IP Route Table for VRF "OOBM" '*' denotes best ucast next-hop '**' denotes best mcast next-hop '[x/y]' denotes [preference/metric] '%' in via output denotes VRF  10.x.18.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.18.3, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d01h, direct 10.x.18.1/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.18.1, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d01h, hsrp 10.x.18.3/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.18.3, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d01h, local 10.x.19.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.123, Eth1/51.1, [110/44], 02:20:53, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.112/30, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.124, Eth1/52.1, [110/44], 3d23h, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.116/30, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.118, Eth1/47, [0/0], 3d23h, direct 10.x.254.118/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.118, Eth1/47, [0/0], 3d23h, local 10.x.254.120/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.123, Eth1/51.1, [110/8], 02:20:53, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.122/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.122, Eth1/51.1, [0/0], 02:21:03, direct 10.x.254.122/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.122, Eth1/51.1, [0/0], 02:21:03, local 10.x.254.124/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.125, Eth1/52.1, [0/0], 2w3d, direct 10.x.254.125/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.125, Eth1/52.1, [0/0], 2w3d, local 10.x.254.126/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.124, Eth1/52.1, [110/8], 02:21:07, ospf-a2, intra 
IPN102 ping to Site B HSRP address
PING 10.x.19.1 (10.x.19.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=254 time=1.138 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=0.862 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=254 time=0.981 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=254 time=0.604 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.19.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=254 time=0.581 ms 
IPN102 traceroute to 10.x.19.1 Site B HSRP address
traceroute to 10.x.19.1 (10.x.19.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 10.x.19.1 (10.x.19.1) 1.003 ms 0.679 ms 0.624 ms 
Shouldnt this be two hops ? via the OSPF interlinks ?
IPN202 show ip route vrf OOBM
IP Route Table for VRF "OOBM" '*' denotes best ucast next-hop '**' denotes best mcast next-hop '[x/y]' denotes [preference/metric] '%' in via output denotes VRF  10.x.18.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.122, Eth1/51.1, [110/44], 02:23:04, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.19.0/24, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.19.3, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d01h, direct 10.x.19.1/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.19.1, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d01h, hsrp 10.x.19.3/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.19.3, Vlan1337, [0/0], 4d01h, local 10.x.254.112/30, ubest/mbest: 2/0 *via 10.x.254.120, Eth1/52.1, [110/48], 02:23:04, ospf-a2, intra *via 10.x.254.122, Eth1/51.1, [110/48], 02:23:04, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.116/30, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.122, Eth1/51.1, [110/44], 02:23:04, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.120/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.121, Eth1/52.1, [0/0], 4d02h, direct 10.x.254.121/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.121, Eth1/52.1, [0/0], 4d02h, local 10.x.254.122/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10.x.254.123, Eth1/51.1, [0/0], 02:23:14, direct 10.x.254.123/32, ubest/mbest: 1/0, attached *via 10..254.123, Eth1/51.1, [0/0], 02:23:14, local 10.x.254.124/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.122, Eth1/51.1, [110/8], 02:23:04, ospf-a2, intra 10.x.254.126/31, ubest/mbest: 1/0 *via 10.x.254.120, Eth1/52.1, [110/8], 02:23:17, ospf-a2, intra 
IPN 202 ping to siteA 10.x.18.1 HSRP Address
PING 10.x.18.1 (10.x.18.1): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=254 time=1.201 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=254 time=0.654 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=254 time=0.497 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=254 time=0.553 ms 64 bytes from 10.x.18.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=254 time=0.515 ms 
IPN202 traceroute to siteA 10.x.18.1 HSRP address
traceroute to 10.x.18.1 (10.x.18.1), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 10.x.18.1 (10.x.18.1) 1.219 ms 0.913 ms 1.017 ms 
Shouldnt this be two hops ? via the OSPF interlinks ?
submitted by Vin-Cheezel to networking [link] [comments]


2019.09.01 18:14 Fizarak Creating New Active Directory Site Not Creating Appropriate DNS Entries

I'm looking for some advice here as after searching for a few hours I haven't found anything relevant yet.
Running domain/forest level 2008 R2 (upgraded at least once from 2003, but may have originally been a 2000 level domain).
SiteA - DataCenter w/ domain controllers SiteB - Site without domain controllers
Basically, I am creating sites within AD Site & Services. The site in question do not have a domain controller in them. As there is no local domain controller for that subnet I want the workstations for that site to authenticate to a specific domain controller in another site. I have site links created specifically for SiteA and SiteB and lowered the link cost. I've also tried turning off "Bridge all site links."
The issue is that authentication is still random. In looking into it I noticed that DNS is not creating the relevant site SRV records. All the sites that have a domain controller have entries, but the ones without a DC do not. They don't even have a folder in DNS under domain -> _Sites.
I don't have an identical lab environment, but in it when I have tested this these DNS entries are made as soon as a new site is created in AD Sites & Services.
It seems like automatic site coverage and/or DNS is failing somewhere. I'm just not sure what to check and either this is a very rare issue or I am completely failing on my search terms.

Anyone have experience with this?
submitted by Fizarak to sysadmin [link] [comments]


2019.02.05 09:01 sirishhazari vSphere 6.7 Physical versus Virtual RDM update ?

im looking for information related to Physical RDM versus Virtual RDM in vSphere 6.7? Is the physical rdm deprecated from vSphere 6.7 onwards? If i provision VM with hardware version 11 to 13 do i get physical rdm functionality of Old?
to be more explicit
migrate the existing vSphere 6.0 version Microsoft cluster VMs with Physical RDMs having independent_persistent disk mode to the new 6.7 vSphere version without losing the existing data and VM clustering configuration
i've vSphere 6.0 MSCS VMs in SiteA with pRDM configured as independent disk and we are trying to failover to vSphere 6.7 in SiteB using Recoverpoint. Initially we did not see option of pRDM with dependent and independent modes in vSphere 6.7..after going thru VMware documentation found pRDM modes options no more available in vSphere 6.7.
Now after spending sometime configuring MSCS Cluster in vSphere 6.7 we found modes options with pRDM for no reason whatsoever. And that too not consistent ..we see modes option in one esxi host whereas other host doesn't show modes option.
Now we've situation where we need to take a decision whether to go with pRDM or shift vRDM. vRDM limitation being MSCS can be configured only on one host i.e both MSCS Nodes must be located in same host which i know client is not going to agree too.
In summary what's pRDM support roadmap from VMware..are they planning to make pRDM redundant in the future



submitted by sirishhazari to vmware [link] [comments]


2018.11.29 16:14 mjonat Loading images from one website domain to another

Hi guys,
So I havent tried this yet (mostly because to try it I have to fuck with 2 live website domains of one of my clients and I dont really want to do that) but I thought I would ask if its even possible / what sort of hiccups I might run into.
So I have built a website for a client and they have some data on that website that they would like to replicate on another sister website. Each website would have its own unique domain and both would be protected over SSL / https and would both be on the same hosting but in different folders on the host server essentially.
On the website that actually has the information I need I would output text and image urls in the form of JSON which the second website would read and then load appropriately.
My main question here is if website A has the image and can output through an API some JSON that has the url of an image hosted on website A, can I take that url and put it into a html img element on website B and expect it to load from website A?
So as an example to hopefully clear things up:
The source sites URL would be something like https://sitea.com/images/image.jpg
Then if I had inside site b (which would have a different url....lets say https://siteb.com/ ) an image referencing that image https://sitea.com/images/image.jpg)" /> would it actually load or would I get an error because of https or css (cross site scripting) or anything like that?
Both of the sites are created within the processwire CMS and I will be using PHP and javascript to accomplish the above.
Any suggestions for a better way to do this would also be greatly appreciated.
submitted by mjonat to webdev [link] [comments]


2018.11.15 17:08 inzeos Best Practice Linux Disk Permissions Virtual Host Different Webmasters

I thought I had a resource booked marked that covered this; however, I'm filling in for a resource and don't want to screw something up to badly.
We have an apache 2.4.* server up and running with a handful of virtual hosts all managed by the same webmaster. We have another webmaster who will be responsible for a virtual host; however, this new webmaster should not have any visibility into the other sites.
Currently the sites are set up like...
/path/to/sitea.domain.x/public_html /path/to/siteb.domain.x/public_html
Prior to this change request we had everything available via www-data to the sitea directory structure.
submitted by inzeos to apache [link] [comments]


2018.09.20 01:27 momtartin Pulling data from another cell based on Drop Down Menu selection

I'm trying to create a report that shows our delivered amount of data, broken out by category, per specific title.
So for example, I'm going to create a drop down menu that I can select "Site A" The on the next few rows, I want it to pull data specifically for that journal for a few categories that I have on another tab:
Paid Unfilled House Programmatic
I have the data for Paid/House/Programmatic on one tab, with the corresponding site code and order type:
Site Paid Programmatic House
SiteA 1000 500 222
SiteB 2000 600 7241
SiteC 3533 3553 2412
and then unfilled on another with the corresponding code.
Site Unfilled
SiteA 1234
SiteB 1235
SiteC 1242
I know how to create the drop down menu, but I'm struggling to figure out how to pull in the corresponding data for the selected site based on that.
submitted by momtartin to excel [link] [comments]


2018.09.13 16:29 inflatablejerk Exchange 2016 controlled datacenter failover help

Hi Everyone,
I have been trying to search, but cant to seem to find any instructions for this. This weekend, We are doing a semi-controlled Failover from our Primary Datacenter to our secondary. First test is to just disable the nics on the Exchange servers, But id also like to have a process for manual site failover. I am trying to find instructions on how to manually fail every database/services from SiteA to SiteB. IE, We would like a procedure for if a hurricane hits one of our data centers. Has this Process changed since 2010?
Current Environment: * Exchange 2016 CU6 * Running Active/Active with 3 copies of each DB. (2 in Primary site, 3rd in second site) * single namespace for all services.
Please let me know if you need more info. Any help would greatly be appreciated. thanks!
submitted by inflatablejerk to exchangeserver [link] [comments]


2017.12.27 20:34 YourRedditUser Disjoined DC - Still created new users .

Client has two sites: SiteA and SiteFUbaR
In SiteA they have a relatively normal functioning domain with two DCs (2008 and 2012). Old DirIT guy thought it wise to setup a new DC in SiteA, then carry it to SiteFUbaR and change the IP to sit on a brand new subnet. No connectivity between SiteA and SiteFUbaR, so no AD replication chatter.
Client goes about business, when new hire are in SiteFUbaR they get a user account and mailbox on Exch server in SiteA, but then ANOTER user account in SiteFUbaR for them to login to their computer (that is also domain joined from SiteFUbaR).
I have two user objects for the same person on both sides now, no connectivity, the disconnected DC is beyond tombstone lifetime. My thought is that I need to do the following:
  • Copy the user SID from SiteFUbaR to the SID History on the user object in SiteA.
  • Drop the DC in SiteFUbaR offline
  • Bring up a VPN Tunnel between the locations
  • Remove & Rejoin the computers in SiteFUbaR to the domain across the tunnel
  • Login with the user object that lives in SiteA on the computers in SiteFUbaR.
Few Questions:
  • Will this work?
  • Will the user logging into the PC pick up the old profile (Win7) because of the SIDHistory or will I need to use something like ADMT to move the profile data over?
  • Figure I will have to do metadata cleanup for the old DC. Can you demote the old DC if it is not able to see the other servers? Thinking of demoting it then re-promoting to RODC since it is a small office.
If I am totally off base, let me know. Thanks!
submitted by YourRedditUser to msp [link] [comments]